I had the opportunity to further research the issue. In Martin v. Bajgar (In re Bajgar), 104 F.3d 495, 501 (1st Cir. Mass. 1997) , the fact that the transfer was disclosed in the schedules did not matter. The “transfer bell” could not be unrung through disclosure.
Even if the debtor recovers the [...]
Related posts:
See the full article at Bankruptcy Information Dallas
Related posts: